Head to head

Long March 3B/E vs Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M

Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.

Payload to low Earth orbit

Relative

Long March 3B/E: 12,000 kg

Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M: 8,200 kg

Side by side

11 comparable figures

The highlighted value wins the row. Rows where neither direction is better, like length or stage count, highlight nothing.

MetricLong March 3B/ESoyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M
Flights flown7836
Success rate97.4%100%
Payload to LEO (kg)12,0008,200
Payload to GTO (kg)5,5003,250
Launch cost$70M$48.5M
Cost per kg to LEO$5,833$5,915
Liftoff thrust (kN)5,9244,150
Length (m)56.346.3
Diameter (m)3.3510.3
Launch mass (t)456313
Stages34

Long March 3B/E

Flight record
97.4% success rate76 of 78 flown · 2 failed
2007peak 2025 · 13 flights2026

Maiden flight 2007-05-13. Still flying.

Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M

Flight record
100% success rate36 of 36 flown
2017peak 2021 · 8 flights2026

Maiden flight 2008-07-26. Still flying.

Long March 3B/E is built by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation of China.Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M is built by Progress Rocket Space Center of Russia (company profile on Space Index).

Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: Long March 3B/E · Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M.

Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.