Head to head
H-IIA vs Long March 2D
Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.
Payload to low Earth orbit
Side by side
| Metric | H-IIA | Long March 2D |
|---|---|---|
| Flights flown | 50 | 101 |
| Success rate | 98% | 99% |
| Payload to LEO (kg) | 10,000 | 3,500 |
| Launch cost | $90M | $30M |
| Cost per kg to LEO | $9,000 | $8,571 |
| Liftoff thrust (kN) | 2,260 | 2,962 |
| Length (m) | 53 | 38.3 |
| Diameter (m) | 4 | 3.35 |
| Launch mass (t) | 285 | 232 |
| Stages | 2 | 2 |
H-IIA
98% success rate49 of 50 flown · 1 failed
2001peak 2017 · 6 flights2025
Long March 2D
99% success rate100 of 101 flown · 1 failed
1992peak 2022 · 14 flights2026
H-IIA is built by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of Japan (company profile on Space Index).Long March 2D is built by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation of China.
Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: H-IIA · Long March 2D.
Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.