Head to head
Long March 3B vs Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat
Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.
Payload to low Earth orbit
Side by side
| Metric | Long March 3B | Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat |
|---|---|---|
| Flights flown | 24 | 26 |
| Success rate | 87.5% | 92.3% |
| Payload to LEO (kg) | 11,500 | 8,200 |
| Payload to GTO (kg) | 5,100 | 3,250 |
| Launch cost | $70M | $80M |
| Cost per kg to LEO | $6,087 | $9,756 |
| Liftoff thrust (kN) | 5,923 | 4,150 |
| Length (m) | 54.8 | 46.3 |
| Diameter (m) | 3.35 | 2.95 |
| Launch mass (t) | 426 | 312 |
| Stages | 3 | 4 |
Long March 3B
87.5% success rate21 of 24 flown · 3 failed
1996peak 2020 · 4 flights2023
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat
92.3% success rate24 of 26 flown · 2 failed
2006peak 2011 · 4 flights2026
Long March 3B is built by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation of China.Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat is built by Progress Rocket Space Center of Russia.
Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: Long March 3B · Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat.
Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.