Head to head
Soyuz 2.1a vs Tsiklon-3
Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.
Payload to low Earth orbit
Side by side
| Metric | Soyuz 2.1a | Tsiklon-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Flights flown | 58 | 122 |
| Success rate | 98.3% | 94.3% |
| Payload to LEO (kg) | 7,020 | 4,100 |
| Launch cost | $80M | $15M |
| Cost per kg to LEO | $11,396 | $3,659 |
| Liftoff thrust (kN) | 4,149 | 2,713 |
| Length (m) | 46.3 | 39.27 |
| Diameter (m) | 2.95 | 3 |
| Launch mass (t) | 312 | 189 |
| Stages | 3 | 3 |
Soyuz 2.1a
98.3% success rate57 of 58 flown · 1 failed
2004peak 2023 · 7 flights2026
Tsiklon-3
94.3% success rate115 of 122 flown · 7 failed
1977peak 1985 · 12 flights2009
Soyuz 2.1a is built by Progress Rocket Space Center of Russia.Tsiklon-3 is built by Yuzhnoye Design Bureau of Ukraine.
Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: Soyuz 2.1a · Tsiklon-3.
Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.