Head to head
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat vs Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M
Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.
Payload to low Earth orbit
Side by side
| Metric | Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat | Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M |
|---|---|---|
| Flights flown | 26 | 36 |
| Success rate | 92.3% | 100% |
| Payload to LEO (kg) | 8,200 | 8,200 |
| Payload to GTO (kg) | 3,250 | 3,250 |
| Launch cost | $80M | $48.5M |
| Cost per kg to LEO | $9,756 | $5,915 |
| Liftoff thrust (kN) | 4,150 | 4,150 |
| Length (m) | 46.3 | 46.3 |
| Diameter (m) | 2.95 | 10.3 |
| Launch mass (t) | 312 | 313 |
| Stages | 4 | 4 |
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat
92.3% success rate24 of 26 flown · 2 failed
2006peak 2011 · 4 flights2026
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M
100% success rate36 of 36 flown
2017peak 2021 · 8 flights2026
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat is built by Progress Rocket Space Center of Russia.Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M is built by Progress Rocket Space Center of Russia (company profile on Space Index).
Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat · Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat-M.
Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.