Head to head
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat vs Vega-C
Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.
Payload to low Earth orbit
Side by side
| Metric | Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat | Vega-C |
|---|---|---|
| Flights flown | 26 | 8 |
| Success rate | 92.3% | 87.5% |
| Payload to LEO (kg) | 8,200 | 3,300 |
| Payload to SSO (kg) | 4,900 | 2,230 |
| Launch cost | $80M | $48M |
| Cost per kg to LEO | $9,756 | $14,545 |
| Liftoff thrust (kN) | 4,150 | 2,974 |
| Length (m) | 46.3 | 34.8 |
| Diameter (m) | 2.95 | 3 |
| Launch mass (t) | 312 | 210 |
| Stages | 4 | 4 |
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat
92.3% success rate24 of 26 flown · 2 failed
2006peak 2011 · 4 flights2026
Vega-C
87.5% success rate7 of 8 flown · 1 failed
2022peak 2026 · 4 flights2026
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat is built by Progress Rocket Space Center of Russia.Vega-C is built by Avio S.p.A of Italy (company profile on Space Index).
Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat · Vega-C.
Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.