Head to head
Long March 2D vs Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat
Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.
Payload to low Earth orbit
Side by side
| Metric | Long March 2D | Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat |
|---|---|---|
| Flights flown | 101 | 26 |
| Success rate | 99% | 92.3% |
| Payload to LEO (kg) | 3,500 | 8,200 |
| Payload to SSO (kg) | 1,300 | 4,900 |
| Launch cost | $30M | $80M |
| Cost per kg to LEO | $8,571 | $9,756 |
| Liftoff thrust (kN) | 2,962 | 4,150 |
| Length (m) | 38.3 | 46.3 |
| Diameter (m) | 3.35 | 2.95 |
| Launch mass (t) | 232 | 312 |
| Stages | 2 | 4 |
Long March 2D
99% success rate100 of 101 flown · 1 failed
1992peak 2022 · 14 flights2026
Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat
92.3% success rate24 of 26 flown · 2 failed
2006peak 2011 · 4 flights2026
Long March 2D is built by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation of China.Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat is built by Progress Rocket Space Center of Russia.
Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: Long March 2D · Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat.
Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.