Head to head

Long March 2D vs Soyuz 2.1b

Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.

Payload to low Earth orbit

Relative

Long March 2D: 3,500 kg

Soyuz 2.1b: 8,200 kg

Side by side

10 comparable figures

The highlighted value wins the row. Rows where neither direction is better, like length or stage count, highlight nothing.

Metric	Long March 2D	Soyuz 2.1b
Flights flown	101	25
Success rate	99%	100%
Payload to LEO (kg)	3,500	8,200
Payload to SSO (kg)	1,300	4,900
Launch cost	$30M	$80M
Cost per kg to LEO	$8,571	$9,756
Length (m)	38.3	46.3
Diameter (m)	3.35	2.95
Launch mass (t)	232	312
Stages	2	3

Long March 2D

Flight record

99% success rate100 of 101 flown · 1 failed

1992peak 2022 · 14 flights2026

Maiden flight 1992-08-09. Still flying.

Soyuz 2.1b

Flight record

100% success rate25 of 25 flown

2008peak 2021 · 4 flights2026

Maiden flight 2008-07-26. Still flying.

Long March 2D is built by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation of China.Soyuz 2.1b is built by Progress Rocket Space Center of Russia (company profile on Space Index).

Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: Long March 2D · Soyuz 2.1b.

Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.