Head to head
Long March 2D vs Tsiklon-3
Two vehicles in the same payload class. Every figure below comes from the same two sources for both rockets, and a row appears only when both publish the input.
Payload to low Earth orbit
Side by side
| Metric | Long March 2D | Tsiklon-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Flights flown | 101 | 122 |
| Success rate | 99% | 94.3% |
| Payload to LEO (kg) | 3,500 | 4,100 |
| Launch cost | $30M | $15M |
| Cost per kg to LEO | $8,571 | $3,659 |
| Liftoff thrust (kN) | 2,962 | 2,713 |
| Length (m) | 38.3 | 39.27 |
| Diameter (m) | 3.35 | 3 |
| Launch mass (t) | 232 | 189 |
| Stages | 2 | 3 |
Long March 2D
99% success rate100 of 101 flown · 1 failed
1992peak 2022 · 14 flights2026
Tsiklon-3
94.3% success rate115 of 122 flown · 7 failed
1977peak 1985 · 12 flights2009
Long March 2D is built by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation of China.Tsiklon-3 is built by Yuzhnoye Design Bureau of Ukraine.
Full specifications and the complete launch history for each: Long March 2D · Tsiklon-3.
Specifications from Launch Library 2 by The Space Devs, launch records from Space Index. Derived figures are computed here; see sources and method.